Kamala Harris election result has come back into the spotlight after a major lawsuit was filed questioning the integrity of the 2024 presidential election—specifically Donald Trump’s victory. On June 10, 2025, a case brought by SMART Legislation, a legal advocacy group linked to SMART Elections, was allowed to move forward in New York’s Rockland County Supreme Court.
| Site | Subscription Price | Supported Countries |
|---|---|---|
| FuboTV | 5-day free trial, $10–$90/month | USA, Canada, Spain |
| ESPN+ | $11.99/month | USA |
| Fanatiz | €6.99–€10.99/month | Worldwide |
| StreamLocator | 7-day free trial, no credit card required! $9.90/month | Worldwide |
The plaintiffs are calling for a full hand recount of ballots from the 2024 election, claiming that votes for Kamala Harris and other candidates were not properly counted by voting machines. The court has scheduled the next hearing for September 22, 2025, which could reveal more about what really happened with the vote count.
What’s at the center of this Kamala Harris election result lawsuit?
At the heart of the case is the claim that hundreds of votes in Rockland County—particularly in the town of Ramapo—went missing or were not recorded correctly. Sworn affidavits from voters and poll workers suggest that ballots showed votes for President, U.S. Senate, and House of Representatives, but the official results showed zero votes for these contests in some machines.
The lawsuit is supported by election integrity experts, including Susan Greenhalgh, who pointed out the suspicious results where down-ballot races like Congress had votes, but the presidential column was blank—an extremely rare occurrence.
| Site | Subscription Price | Supported Countries |
|---|---|---|
| FuboTV | 5-day free trial, $10–$90/month | USA, Canada, Spain |
| ESPN+ | $11.99/month | USA |
| Fanatiz | €6.99–€10.99/month | Worldwide |
| StreamLocator | 7-day free trial, no credit card required! $9.90/month | Worldwide |
This raised serious questions about whether the voting machines malfunctioned, were tampered with, or failed to register certain selections.
Live Events
Could the hand recount really change Trump’s win?
In short—no, not at the national level. Even if the court finds that votes for Kamala Harris were undercounted or missing in Rockland County, the 2024 presidential election has already been certified, and Donald Trump is currently serving his second term. However, the hand recount could have major implications:
- It might uncover errors or inconsistencies in the vote counting process.
- If serious enough, it could trigger audits or investigations in other counties or states.
- It may also lead to new legislation around voting machine standards and election transparency.
The judge, Rachel Tanguay, has allowed full discovery in the case, meaning attorneys can now request internal voting logs, machine records, and possibly call witnesses under oath.
| Site | Subscription Price | Supported Countries |
|---|---|---|
| FuboTV | 5-day free trial, $10–$90/month | USA, Canada, Spain |
| ESPN+ | $11.99/month | USA |
| Fanatiz | €6.99–€10.99/month | Worldwide |
| StreamLocator | 7-day free trial, no credit card required! $9.90/month | Worldwide |
Why is Rockland County the focus of this lawsuit?
Rockland County, New York, became a focal point because of statistical irregularities in the vote count. According to the lawsuit, there were five machines in Ramapo that showed zero votes for president—even though people voted for other races on the same ballots. That kind of discrepancy is highly unusual.
In addition, local voters have come forward, saying they clearly voted for Kamala Harris, but later saw no record of their votes. The complaint also points to updates made to the machines in secret just weeks before the election, including new software reviewed by Pro V&V, a private lab which made some adjustments with little public transparency.
These details have raised eyebrows and pushed the court to take the allegations seriously enough to allow the case to proceed.
What could this lawsuit mean for future U.S. elections?
Even though it won’t overturn Trump’s 2024 victory, the Kamala Harris election result lawsuit could change the way elections are handled going forward. If the recount finds missing votes or machine errors, it could:
- Lead to new state or federal election laws
- Pressure officials to ban certain voting machine software
- Increase demand for hand-marked paper ballots
- Push for independent audits in close elections
The case is also seen as a way for Democrats and election advocates to rebuild voter trust and ensure that future votes—no matter the party—are counted fairly and transparently.
What comes next?
- Hand recount on ballots: Voters may finally see if paper records match machine tallies.
- Discovery process: Lawyers will get internal records, logs, and allow sworn testimony under oath.
- Possible audits or probes: Findings may lead states or even Congress to investigate deeper.
- Limited outcome impact: The case won’t change Trump’s win—but it could reshape election policies.
While Donald Trump’s 2024 win remains secure, this lawsuit surrounding the Kamala Harris election result is drawing serious attention to how votes are counted and verified. As the court date in September approaches, many will be watching closely to see if this case uncovers issues that go beyond Rockland County—and what it might mean for the future of U.S. democracy.
FAQs:
Q1: What is the Kamala Harris election result lawsuit about?
It challenges missing votes for Kamala Harris in Rockland County voting machines.
Q2: Will the lawsuit affect Donald Trump’s 2024 victory?
No, but it may push for recounts and new voting laws.
