BREAKING

Uncategorized

Mapping, understanding and reducing belief in misinformation about electric vehicles

  • Wang, T., Tang, T.-Q., Huang, H.-J. & Qu, X. The adverse impact of electric vehicles on traffic congestion in the morning commute. Transp. Res. Part C Emerging Technol. 125, 103073 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, J. et al. Energy demand reduction options for meeting national zero-emission targets in the United Kingdom. Nat. Energy 7, 726–735 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Herberz, M., Hahnel, U. J. J. & Brosch, T. Counteracting electric vehicle range concern with a scalable behavioural intervention. Nat. Energy 7, 503–510 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Needell, Z. A., McNerney, J., Chang, M. T. & Trancik, J. E. Potential for widespread electrification of personal vehicle travel in the United States. Nat. Energy 1, 16112 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • ABC News In-depth Media Watch. EV myth-busting: media ignoring the facts. YouTube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eDEhsh9pgpc (2024).

  • Edwards, A. Electric car safety: myth or fact. Smith’s Lawyers https://www.smithslawyers.com.au/post/electric-car-safety (2024).

  • Tchetchik, A., Kaplan, S. & Rotem-Mindali, O. Do non-ionizing radiation concerns affect people’s choice between hybrid and traditional cars? Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 131, 104226 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Southwell, B. G., Brennen, J. S. B., Paquin, R., Boudewyns, V. & Zeng, J. Defining and measuring scientific misinformation. Ann. Am. Acad. Polit. Social Sci. 700, 98–111 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Coan, T. G., Boussalis, C., Cook, J. & Nanko, M. O. Computer-assisted classification of contrarian claims about climate change. Sci. Rep. 11, 22320 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Slevin, I., Kattrup, W., Marcil, C. & Roberts, J. T. Beyond dark money: information subsidies and complex networks of opposition to offshore wind on the U.S. East Coast. Energy Res. Social Sci. 119, 103829 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Druckman, J. N. & Bolsen, T. Framing, motivated reasoning, and opinions about emergent technologies. J. Commun. 61, 659–688 (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahan, D. M. Fixing the communications failure. Nature 463, 296–297 (2010).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornsey, M. J. & Fielding, K. S. Attitude roots and Jiu Jitsu persuasion: understanding and overcoming the motivated rejection of science. Am. Psychol. 72, 459–473 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmichael, J. T. & Brulle, R. J. Elite cues, media coverage, and public concern: an integrated path analysis of public opinion on climate change, 2001–2013. Environ. Polit. 26, 232–252 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Antonio, R. J. & Brulle, R. J. The unbearable lightness of politics: climate change denial and political polarization. Sociolog. Q. 52, 195–202 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  • McCright, A. M. & Dunlap, R. E. Anti-reflexivity: the American conservative movement’s success in undermining climate science and policy. Theory Cult. Soc. 27, 100–133 (2010).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunlap, R. E., McCright, A. M. & Yarosh, J. H. The political divide on climate change: partisan polarization widens in the U.S. Environ.: Sci. Policy Sustain. Dev. 58, 4–23 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Priessner, A., Sposato, R. & Hampl, N. Predictors of electric vehicle adoption: an analysis of potential electric vehicle drivers in Austria. Energy Policy 122, 701–714 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Chuang, F., Manley, E. & Petersen, A. The role of worldviews in the governance of sustainable mobility. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 4034–4042 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkebile-Weinberg, M., Goldwert, D., Doell, K. C., Van Bavel, J. J. & Vlasceanu, M. The differential impact of climate interventions along the political divide in 60 countries. Nat. Commun. 15, 3885 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter, K., Hornsey, M. J., Pummerer, L. & Sassenberg, K. Anticipating and defusing the role of conspiracy beliefs in shaping opposition to wind farms. Nat. Energy 7, 1200–1207 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter, K., Hornsey, M. J., Pummerer, L. & Sassenberg, K. Public agreement with misinformation about wind farms. Nat. Commun. 15, 8888 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Badole, S. B., Bird, S., Heintzelman, M. D. & Legault, L. Willingness to pay for solar adoption: economic, ideological, motivational, and demographic factors. Energy Econ. 136, 107703 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Dokshin, F. A. & Gherghina, M. Party affiliation predicts homeowners’ decisions to install solar PV, but partisan gap wanes with improved economics of solar. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 121, e2303519121 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Mildenberger, M., Howe, P. D. & Miljanich, C. Households with solar installations are ideologically diverse and more politically active than their neighbours. Nat. Energy 4, 1033–1039 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazboun, S., Stelmach, G. & Cox, P. M. Who will ‘go electric’? American homeowners’ perceptions of home energy sources and home electrification. Energy Res. Social Sci. 113, 103575 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Imhoff, R. On the usefulness of the conspiracy mentality concept. Z. Psychol. 232, 59–63 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Imhoff, R. & Bruder, M. Speaking (un‐)truth to power: conspiracy mentality as a generalised political attitude. Eur. J. Personal. 28, 25–43 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Imhoff, R. et al. Conspiracy mentality and political orientation across 26 countries. Nat. Hum. Behav. 6, 392–403 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewandowsky, S., Gignac, G. E. & Oberauer, K. The role of conspiracist ideation and worldviews in predicting rejection of science. PLoS ONE 8, e75637 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornsey, M. J., Harris, E. A. & Fielding, K. S. The psychological roots of anti-vaccination attitudes: a 24-nation investigation. Health Psychol. 37, 307–315 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornsey, M. J., Finlayson, M., Chatwood, G. & Begeny, C. T. Donald Trump and vaccination: the effect of political identity, conspiracist ideation and presidential tweets on vaccine hesitancy. J. Exp. Social Psychol. 88, 103947 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Costello, T. H., Pennycook, G. & Rand, D. G. Durably reducing conspiracy beliefs through dialogues with AI. Science 385, eadq1814 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Sultan, M. et al. Susceptibility to online misinformation: a systematic meta-analysis of demographic and psychological factors. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 121, e240932912 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • DeVerna, M. R., Yan, H. Y., Yang, K.-C. & Menczer, F. Fact-checking information from large language models can decrease headline discernment. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 121, e2322823121 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Stasielowicz, L. The effectiveness of interventions addressing conspiracy beliefs: A meta-analysis. Preprint at OSF https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/6vs5u (2024).

  • Hornsey, M. J., Bierwiaczonek, K., Sassenberg, K. & Douglas, K. M. Individual, intergroup and nation-level influences on belief in conspiracy theories. Nat. Rev. Psychol. 2, 85–97 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Roozenbeek, J., Remshard, M. & Kyrychenko, Y. Beyond the headlines: on the efficacy and effectiveness of misinformation interventions. Adv. Psychol. 2, e24569 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Urry, J. The ‘system’ of automobility. Theory Cult. Soc. 21, 25–39 (2004).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, K. S. et al. Realizing the full potential of behavioural science for climate change mitigation. Nat. Clim. Change 14, 322–330 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan, L., Greiff, S., Teuber, Z. & Gašević, D. Promises and challenges of generative artificial intelligence for human learning. Nat. Hum. Behav. 8, 1839–1850 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Goos, M. & Savona, M. The governance of artificial intelligence: harnessing opportunities and mitigating challenges. Res. Policy 53, 104928 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemene, E., Valkhof, B. & Tladi, T. AI and Energy: Will AI Help Reduce Emissions or Increase Demand? Here’s What to Know (World Economic Forum, 2024).

  • Bruder, M., Haffke, P., Neave, N., Nouripanah, N. & Imhoff, R. Measuring individual differences in generic beliefs in conspiracy theories across cultures: conspiracy mentality questionnaire. Front. Psychol. 4, 225 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunlap, R. E., Van Liere, K. D., Mertig, A. G. & Jones, R. E. Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: a revised NEP scale. J. Soc. Issues 56, 425–442 (2000).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Werff, E., Steg, L. & Keizer, K. It is a moral issue: the relationship between environmental self-identity, obligation-based intrinsic motivation and pro-environmental behaviour. Glob. Environ. Change 23, 1258–1265 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, K. S. & Oppenheimer, D. M. Investigating an alternate form of the cognitive reflection test. Judgment Decis. Making 11, 99–113 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamorro‐Premuzic, T. & Furnham, A. Self‐assessed intelligence and academic performance. Educ. Psychol. 26, 769–779 (2006).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • At a Glance: Electric Vehicles (US Department of Energy, 2023); https://afdc.energy.gov/files/u/publication/electric-drive_vehicles.pdf

  • Hoes, E., Aitken, B., Zhang, J., Gackowski, T. & Wojcieszak, M. Prominent misinformation interventions reduce misperceptions but increase scepticism. Nat. Hum. Behav. 8, 1545–1553 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Hong, S.-M. & Page, S. A psychological reactance scale: development, factor structure and reliability. Psychol. Rep. 64, 1323–1326 (1989).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Related Posts